The deciding difference is operational: LiteLLM can run on infrastructure you control, Groq cannot. If that constraint is real for you, it settles the choice before anything else is considered.
Self-hosted proxy that speaks one API to 100+ providers, with keys and budgets.
Give every agent its own virtual key so you can attribute and cap spend per surface.
Open-weight models at very low latency.
| LiteLLM | Groq | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Open source | Proprietary |
| Pricing | open source | freemium |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Languages | Python, TypeScript | TypeScript, Python |
| Install | pip install 'litellm[proxy]' | — |
| Keys required | None | GROQ_API_KEY |
The deciding difference is operational: LiteLLM can run on infrastructure you control, Groq cannot. If that constraint is real for you, it settles the choice before anything else is considered. LiteLLM: Self-hosted proxy that speaks one API to 100+ providers, with keys and budgets. Groq: Open-weight models at very low latency.
LiteLLM can run on your own infrastructure. Groq is a hosted service only.
LiteLLM is open source (open source). Groq is proprietary (freemium).
Every page here answers to Accept: text/markdown and returns the same content at roughly a tenth the tokens. No separate site, no toggle — same URL.
curl -s -H "Accept: text/markdown" https://newagent.build/compare/litellm-vs-groq