The deciding difference is operational: LanceDB can run on infrastructure you control, turbopuffer cannot. If that constraint is real for you, it settles the choice before anything else is considered.
Vector and full-text search on object storage — very cheap at rest.
Embedded multimodal store backed by the Lance columnar format.
| turbopuffer | LanceDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Proprietary | Open source |
| Pricing | usage based | open source |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Languages | Python, TypeScript | Python, TypeScript |
| Install | — | pip install lancedb |
| Keys required | TURBOPUFFER_API_KEY | None |
The deciding difference is operational: LanceDB can run on infrastructure you control, turbopuffer cannot. If that constraint is real for you, it settles the choice before anything else is considered. turbopuffer: Vector and full-text search on object storage — very cheap at rest. LanceDB: Embedded multimodal store backed by the Lance columnar format.
turbopuffer is a hosted service only. LanceDB can run on your own infrastructure.
turbopuffer is proprietary (usage based). LanceDB is open source (open source).
Every page here answers to Accept: text/markdown and returns the same content at roughly a tenth the tokens. No separate site, no toggle — same URL.
curl -s -H "Accept: text/markdown" https://newagent.build/compare/turbopuffer-vs-lancedb